07:49, Thursday, 16.08.2018
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
RSS
ქართული English

Web Portal on Human Rights in Georgia

Go
Advanced Search

The Coalition is Starting “Make Courts Trustworthy” Campaign

02.03.2018

 
 
Recent developments in the judiciary once again exposed the extent of the systemic problems in the judiciary. It is clear that the reforms implemented in the court system in recent years failed to achieve their main objective of having justice delivered by independent and impartial judges whose integrity and competence are not in doubt. 
The main challenges remaining to date include:
  • Insufficient political will for improving the judiciary
The three waves of judicial reforms implemented to date have not obtained their objective of improving the judiciary. The main reason for this is that the legislative changes were incomplete, belated, and often adapted to the interests of the influential group of judges. The ruling party is also responsible for appointing non-judge members to the High Council of Justice (HCOJ), the majority of whom failed to demonstrate sufficient integrity and without whose support the HCOJ could not have made its judicial appointments and other important decisions.

Today we are hearing outraged statements from some members of the parliamentary majority and ruling party regarding the lifelong appointment of judges. When almost half of Georgia’s judges are already appointed for life using opaque procedures, such reactions from the governing party are belated. It is clear that the government is trying to shift the blame for the situation in the judiciary.
  • Clan-based governance of the judicial system
At all stages of judicial selection and appointment, we are left with the feeling that judicial appointments are based on the candidates’ loyalty to the influential group and probable nepotism.  There are valid concerns that the HCOJ is using its authority and legislative deficiencies to eradicate dissent from the system and to further strengthen its own positions. In this situation judges are reluctant to make critical statements regarding the problems inside the judiciary. The developments regarding Batumi City Court Judge Irakli Shavadze are proof of this. The judge’s statement indicates signs of a crime that should be investigated.

Today, court chairs are perceived as chiefs/superiors of other judges. This was further proven by the collective statement issued by judges of Batumi City Court. Judicial administrative positions are usually held by members of the same group, yielding special powers within the judiciary. The February 26 decision of the HCOJ is a proof of this. This decision appointed the HCOJ and influential group member Levan Tevzadze as the Chair of Criminal Chamber at the Tbilisi Court of Appeals, likely as a result of nepotism.
  • Opaque and unsubstantiated judicial appointment decisions
Unfortunately, the current membership of the HCOJ is continuing with the established faulty practices of judicial appointment. On February 22, the HCOJ appointed 44 judges for life. Among them were judges towards whom the public has a very strong negative attitude due to their past high-profile decisions. The appointment process was for the most part held behind closed doors, and one non-judge member of the HCOJ, Anna Dolidze, was not allowed to participate in the selection and appointment process of 14 judges.In this difficult situation, the Coalition believes it is necessary to critically revisit the steps made regarding the judiciary and to acknowledge the problems. For this purpose, the Coalition is starting its “Make Courts Trustworthy” campaign and demands that:
  • the political leadership acknowledge its share of responsibility for the crisis in the judiciary;
  • the judiciary be freed from clan governance;
  • the Prosecutor’s Office take interest in and fully investigate all probable cases of crimes related to the judicial system;
  • the Parliament implement real reforms, based on which the influential group within the judiciary can no longer abuse legislation for its illegitimate purposes.
Coalition members:

  1. Article 42 of the Constitution
  2. Multinational Georgia
  3. American Chamber of Commerce
  4. Georgian Small and Medium Business Association
  5. Civil Integration Foundation
  6. Georgian Lawyers for Independent Profession
  7. Business and Economic Center
  8. Liberali
  9. Center for Protection of Constitutional Rights
  10. International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy
  11. The Union 21st Century
  12. Georgian Young Lawyers Association
  13. Human Rights Center
  14. Transparency International Georgia
  15. Union of Meskhetian Democrats
  16. Liberty Institute
  17. Civil Development Agency
  18. United Nations Association of Georgia
  19. The European Law Students’ Association Georgia
  20. Civil Society Institute
  21. Open Society Georgia Foundation
  22. Institute of Democracy
  23. Institute for Development of Freedom of Information
  24. Tbilisi Media Club
  25. Human Rights Priority
  26. Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center
  27. Foundation for the Support of Legal Education
  28. Institute of Civil Engagement
  29. Association of Law Firms of Georgia
  30. Association of Young Economists of Georgia
  31. Eurasia Partnership Foundation 
  32. European Choice of Georgia 
  33. Partnership for Human Rights
  34. Human Rights Network
  35. Georgian Democratic Initative
  36. Sapari Union
  37. Rehabilitation Initiative for Vulnerable Groups
  38. Institute for Democracy and Safe Development (IDSD)
  39. LLPL "Frema"
 

Print Send to Friend Send to Facebook Tweet This
Leave your comment
Your name:
Your comment:

Security code: Code
OTHER NEWS
POLL
Do you support initiative on the liberalization of narco-policy in the country?
Yes No I do not know

BLOG

Disbelief based on partiality Reality is different
In recent days, Campaign This Affects You has become more active for the society. A new slogan has appeared on the famous label
Detailed...
Fragile Peace in Balkans
Hungry Commission Members and Commission Chairpersons Angry with Observers in Batumi
Archive




EDITORIAL

Forgotten by government veterans
Every year, fewer and fewer veterans of the World War II meet the Victory Day. The society receives information about them only on
Detailed...
Villages of the Hopeless
What happened to Dream of Justice Revival?
Archive
THEMES

CATEGORIES

Copyright © 2004 - 2018 HRIDC